U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito Jr. was on a roll Wednesday with a litany of hot-button, current events tests of what apparel a Minnesota law might prohibit a voter from wearing inside a polling place.

Alito’s hypotheticals dominated the questioning of Daniel Rogan, the state’s lawyer, in the U.S. Supreme Court arguments in Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky. The Minnesota Voters Alliance and several individuals are challenging the constitutionality of a state law that bans wearing “political badges, political buttons or political insignia” in the polling place.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]