Colorado regulators’ pursuit of two out-of-state companies promoting their cryptocurrency offerings to residents this month was part of the national “Operation Cryptosweep” that resulted in 70 investigations and 35 enforcement actions nationwide, investigators said this week.
The state was among at least a dozen North American regions that stormed the cryptocurrency market in May to weed out fraud in the budding business of selling virtual coins, also known as initial coin offerings, or ICOs. Several companies in New Jersey, Alabama, New York and British Columbia received cease-and-desist letters, according to the North American Securities Administrators Association.
Colorado Securities Commissioner Gerald Rome said he went after Linda Healthcare Corp. in Milpitas, Calif., and Broad Investments in Sammamish, Wash., because they violated state securities law by promoting the offering to Colorado residents but failed to disclose investment risks. They also did not have an operating website.
“We have more investigations going,” Rome said in an earlier interview. “We’ll continue to look at what’s happening in Colorado and doing the job that we’re supposed to do.”
Broad Investments’ site is no longer publicly available. Linda Healthcare now has a banner that says, “Because this coin offering constitutes a security in Colorado, we do not accept (the cryptocurrency) ETH from Colorado residents.”
According to ICO tracker CoinSchedule, this year there have been at least 310 ICOs, which raised a total of around $7.5 billion. ICOs sell virtual coins to the public as a way to raise money to fund the business. At least, that’s the idea. Questionable results or misleading campaigns have caused regulators to crack down on such offerings, including one by PlexCoin, which claimed a 1,354 percent profit in fewer than 29 days after its August offering.
Last week, the Securities and Exchange Commission ran a mock ICO called HoweyCoins. People who click on “Buy Coins Now” are sent to an SEC investor information site informing them that they could have been scammed.
But not all coin offerings are fraudulent, nor should they be classified as a security, blockchain advocates say. Cryptocurrency runs on blockchain technology, but the two are not the same thing.
Blockchain is like a cloud-computing network that runs on multiple machines. But it’s not controlled by a Google or Amazon. Rather, it operates on a decentralized network where independent computers vouch for the authenticity of the data, such as medical records and homeownership deeds.
Cryptocurrency, like bitcoin, is like an app that runs on the blockchain. And some coins, called utility tokens, are not intended to have a cash equivalent. They are more like arcade tokens that are no good outside of places such as Chuck E. Cheese’s.
“In the long run, I view the increased regulatory attention that cryptocurrencies and tokens are receiving as a positive sign that the space is maturing, but we have to go beyond investigating suspect deals,” said Frank Ricotta, who is developing a private blockchain that gives people ownership of their own medical records.
“As they gain more notoriety, it’s fair to say that negative news tends to grab the headlines. However, companies and investors alike believe that tokens not only provide more direct access to capital, they also provide a means to create new markets,” he said. “Yes, we must proceed with caution. Too much regulation kills innovation, and not enough creates a breeding ground for fraud.”
The Denver Post needs your support.
Subscribe now for just 99 cents for the first month.