The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling Monday in a Maryland redistricting case cited two “in chambers” rulings, including one from Justice Anthony Kennedy.
The U.S. Supreme Court’s per curiam opinion in the Maryland gerrymandering case, Benisek v. Lamone, did next to nothing to resolve the issue it raised.
But it did do something else useful: It reminded practitioners and others that “in chambers” opinions still matter.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
