Cooperating with the U.S. government during an investigation of potential wrongdoing by your company is supposed to yield tremendous benefits in the form of cooperation credit that theoretically translates into a more favorable outcome. The U.S. Department of Justice’s guidance, for example, says that companies can receive “consideration for cooperation” if they “identify all individuals substantially involved in or responsible for the misconduct at issue…and provide to the Department all relevant facts relating to that misconduct.” Such cooperation credit could significantly reduce fines or penalties or even result in a declination.

Most companies, however, ferret out wrongdoing through investigations conducted by counsel, which involve communications made under the protection of the attorney-client privilege. The resulting analysis of evidence contains attorney mental impressions, as well as advice regarding potential risks, exposure and future litigation. In other words, relevant information discovered in an internal investigation often is protected by either the attorney-client or work product privileges.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]