The Court of Appeals recently addressed an ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claim in People v. Alvarez. The decision is notable for the unusually direct criticism with which the judges address each other’s arguments in the majority opinion and two strong dissents.

Background

Defendant was convicted in 1996 of murder, attempted murder, conspiracy, assault, criminal possession of a weapon and criminal sale of a controlled substance in connection with defendant’s membership in a drug trafficking organization. The trial record included evidence that defendant was involved in a drive-by shooting that resulted in the death of a 14-year-old and injury to two 15-year-olds. At sentencing, defendant refused to apologize to the deceased victim’s family and apparently laughed when the trial court explained its determination to sentence defendant to 66-2/3 years to life in prison.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]