"I will be looking for evidence of mistake, inadvertence, surprise, excusable neglect, or other factors which might explain respondent’s failure to respond to the orders issued in this case," an administrative law judge, Steven Bell, said in a recent order in a whistleblower case against Honeywell.
April 20, 2021 at 02:27 PM
1 minute read
Senior Editor
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Lawyers for Honeywell International Inc. have mounted an eleventh-hour bid to undo a default order after a judge at the U.S. Labor Department found the company had failed to respond to a whistleblower’s claim that she was fired for raising concerns about internal practices.
The case against Honeywell, brought by a former employee who was an installation administrative specialist in Ohio, moved quickly from liability to damages at the Labor Department proceeding.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of CaliforniaThe current term of office for United States Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen in...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
U.S. Labor Department headquarters in Washington. (Photo: Mike Scarcella / ALM)
