Demonstrators for and against abortion rights demonstrate outside the U.S. Supreme Court on the day of arguments in the
Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt case. March 2, 2016.
Recent comments by two neighboring federal appellate judges show the ideological divide over whether courts considering abortion bans—and potentially other pressing issues—should wait for U.S. Supreme Court guidance or push ahead.
As Law.com’s Avalon Zoppo reported last week, Judge Karen Nelson Moore of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sharply criticized what she called the majority’s ”stay-and-delay tactics” in declining to hear a challenge to a Tennessee abortion ban until the U.S. Supreme Court issues its forthcoming decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
