Good morning and happy Tuesday! We’re back with another Supreme Court Brief. Changes to how the high court is publishing preliminary prints of opinions are welcome news to practitioners, but the backlog of slip opinions may create problems for the uninitiated. And Monday’s orders offered no new grants, but a dissent offered by the court’s liberal wing argued its refusal to take up a death penalty case was a misinterpretation of precedent. 

As always, thanks for reading and we welcome feedback and tips. You may contact Avalon Zoppo at [email protected] follow her on Twitter @AvalonZoppo. You can find Brad Kutner at [email protected] and @bradkutner.

The U.S. Supreme Court building. U.S. Supreme Court building. Photo: Shutterstock.com

Practitioners Pleased by Preliminary Prints

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]